Independent · private · adults 18+
Rice Purity Test
A 100-question adult experience checklist with transparent scoring, ten useful category views, and answers that stay on your device.
- Answers never leave this browser
- About 6–9 minutes
- Designed for adults 18+
PRIVATE SCORE SHEET
100A transparent adult experience checklist
This rice purity test is a private 100-item adult experience checklist, not a personality diagnosis. The rice purity test starts at 100 and subtracts one point for each Yes answer. Unlike a shallow score page, this rice purity test also keeps ten category counts so you can see which experiences created the total.
A useful rice purity test should explain its limits. This rice purity test does not call a high score good or a low score bad, and it does not publish an unsupported average. The rice purity test score describes only how many listed experiences you marked; it cannot measure character, maturity, mental health, consent quality, or future choices.
Privacy matters because a rice purity test asks about sensitive behavior. This rice purity test calculates inside your browser, stores progress only on your device, and provides a clear reset. When you share, the rice purity test payload contains the score you chose and the public page address—not your 100 individual answers.
The questions in this rice purity test are original, behavior-specific, and organized for adults. The rice purity test includes direct safety links when selected answers involve sexual health, alcohol, drug mixing, impaired driving, or digital consent. Those links make the rice purity test more useful without pretending the entertainment score is clinical science.
Before starting, decide whether a private checklist is useful today. You may skip the experience entirely, stop at any time, clear the saved choices, or return to the methodology without producing a result. Nothing on the page requires disclosure to another person.
Your private checklist
Answer all 100 questions honestly
Choose Yes or No for every statement. Unanswered is never treated as No, and your score appears only after all 100 answers are complete. You can move between sections, and this browser saves progress locally until you clear it.
Designed for adults 18+
Before you begin
This checklist contains direct questions about sex, alcohol, drugs, legal consequences, and digital boundaries. It is for adults and is not a medical, moral, or psychological assessment.
Your private result
A count of experiences, not a verdict
0 experiences marked Yes
Answer-combination analysis
Your private pattern report
This report looks at which answers appeared together. It describes concentrations and context; it does not infer personality, causation, or a diagnosis.
- Active subthemes
- 0
- Domains represented
- 0
- Safety contexts
- 0
The patterns carrying the most information
These are ranked by concentration, number of matched statements, and whether the cluster changes the safety context. A high rank is not a judgment.
See the answers behind this pattern
See the answers behind this pattern
Connections across domains
Cross-domain links appear only when the relevant answers co-occur. They show context, not proof that one experience caused another.
- Sexual-health answers overlap with impairment or substance context. Consent capacity, barrier decisions, testing, and disclosure should be reviewed together rather than as separate score points.
- Relationship-agreement answers overlap with digital permission or identity answers. The shared theme is whether expectations were explicit, current, and respected across both offline and online settings.
- Substance exposure appears together with control, responsibility, transport, financial, or acute-harm markers. That pattern carries more practical weight than substance variety alone.
- Several consensual or exploratory milestones are present without the listed elevated-risk markers. That narrows the context of this score, but it is not a guarantee of safety or wellbeing.
- Consequence markers appear in multiple domains. Consider whether a repeated situation, setting, or coping pattern links events that the total score treats as unrelated.
- No answer-triggered safety marker appeared. This means only that the specific listed markers were answered No; it does not establish zero risk.
Generated locally from 30 disclosed subthemes and six cross-domain rules. No answers leave this browser.
Your ten-category profile
The bars show how many items you marked in each category. They are not percentiles and do not compare you with an invented average.
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which choices felt genuinely independent, and which were driven by pressure or avoidance?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Do your dating choices match the clarity and honesty you want from other people?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which relationship agreements deserve a clearer conversation now?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Experience count says nothing about worth; consider whether your experiences were wanted, safe, and respectful.
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Is there any testing, contraception, boundary, or healthcare conversation worth arranging?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Has alcohol ever taken more control, time, memory, or safety than you intended?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Does your current use fit your priorities, budget, responsibilities, and health?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
If any use felt hard to control or medically risky, what support would make the next step easier?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which past risk would you handle differently with what you know today?
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Do your digital habits preserve permission, deletion requests, and safety for everyone involved?
Answer-based safety notes
These notes appear only from patterns in your current answers. They are educational, not a diagnosis.
No additional safety note was triggered. That does not replace ordinary care, consent, or professional advice.
Revisit agreements, not labels
A marked secrecy or exclusivity item may signal an unresolved agreement. A direct, safe conversation can clarify expectations without treating the score as proof of intent.
Read about consent and communication ↗Testing decisions depend on context
A score cannot determine whether you need testing. CDC guidance says testing depends on sexual history, practices, symptoms, age, and local factors; a clinician can help choose appropriate tests.
CDC: getting tested for STIs ↗Consent is ongoing
Clear, voluntary agreement matters throughout an interaction, including when substances or digital media are involved. Uncertainty is a reason to pause and check in.
RAINN: Consent 101 ↗Blackouts and breathing problems are safety signals
Memory loss, loss of consciousness, vomiting, or trouble breathing are not ordinary score milestones. If an unconscious person cannot be awakened or breathes abnormally, seek emergency help.
NIAAA: alcohol overdose ↗Mixing can make effects more dangerous
CDC warns that combining alcohol with other drugs can increase overdose, injury, violence, and other harms. A healthcare professional or confidential support service can help assess personal risk.
CDC: alcohol and other drugs ↗Do not plan around impaired driving
A past ride or drive does not predict the future. Use a sober driver, transit, taxi, or a place to stay before drinking or using an impairing substance.
NHTSA: impaired driving ↗Permission travels with the image
Receiving an intimate image is not permission to keep, record, or redistribute it. Honor deletion requests and use platform reporting tools if an image was shared without consent.
FTC: image-based abuse ↗01 · Method
What is a Rice Purity Test?
A Rice Purity Test is a 100-item, self-reported checklist of adult social, romantic, sexual, substance-related, legal, and digital experiences. Each Yes subtracts one point from 100. The result is an entertainment and reflection score—not a validated measure of morality, mental health, personality, maturity, or future behavior.
A transparent method instead of fake science
This version keeps the familiar one-point-per-item logic while making the limits explicit. Questions use behavior-specific language, are grouped into ten domains, and avoid claiming a population norm we cannot document.
Exactly how the score is calculated
Start at 100. Count every item marked Yes. Subtract that count once. A person with 27 Yes answers receives 73. All items have equal weight, so the total cannot distinguish a low-risk milestone from a serious safety event; the separate category and safety notes supply that missing context.
What the score cannot tell you
Lifetime Yes/No questions remove timing, frequency, consent context, severity, and change over time. Sensitive self-report is also vulnerable to memory error and social-desirability bias. Private, self-administered use may reduce observation pressure, but it does not turn this checklist into a clinical instrument.
How to use the result constructively
- Read category patterns before focusing on the headline score.
- Treat triggered safety notes as prompts to check reliable guidance, not as diagnoses.
- Share only the score you choose; never pressure another person to disclose answers.
- Retake only when reflection is useful, not to chase a supposedly better number.
02 · Score guide
Rice Purity Test score meaning without invented averages
Score bands below describe how many of this site's 100 experiences were marked. They are not percentiles, age norms, or claims about what is normal. Two people with the same total can have very different category patterns and very different reasons for their answers.
| Score band | Yes count | Careful reading |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | 0–10 | Mostly unchartedYou marked 0–10 of the listed experiences. That can reflect age, opportunity, preference, privacy, or memory; it is not evidence of superior character. |
| 75–89 | 11–25 | Some chapters openedYou marked 11–25 experiences across the checklist. The category pattern is more informative than the total alone. |
| 50–74 | 26–50 | Broad experienceYou marked 26–50 experiences. A midrange result may combine ordinary milestones with a few higher-risk events. |
| 25–49 | 51–75 | Many chapters exploredYou marked 51–75 experiences. The score is a count, not a diagnosis; review the safety notes and category context. |
| 0–24 | 76–100 | Very high experience countYou marked 76–100 experiences. The total does not define you, but several categories may deserve careful, nonjudgmental review. |
02B · Your ten-category profile
Your ten-category profile
A total score flattens very different experiences. This map makes the questionnaire inspectable before you answer: social independence is not sexual health, consensual experience is not consent quality, and a digital-boundary event is not interchangeable with a dating milestone. Each group still contains ten equal-weight items, so the reflection prompt supplies context rather than changing the formula.
Social & independence
Travel, parties, spontaneity, and private decisions.
Reflection prompt: Which choices felt genuinely independent, and which were driven by pressure or avoidance?
Dating & attraction
First dates, kissing, apps, and early communication.
Reflection prompt: Do your dating choices match the clarity and honesty you want from other people?
Relationships & commitments
Attachment, partnership, exclusivity, and secrecy.
Reflection prompt: Which relationship agreements deserve a clearer conversation now?
Consensual sexual experience
A neutral count of adult sexual experiences.
Reflection prompt: Experience count says nothing about worth; consider whether your experiences were wanted, safe, and respectful.
Sexual health & decision context
Protection, testing, impairment, and informed consent.
Reflection prompt: Is there any testing, contraception, boundary, or healthcare conversation worth arranging?
Alcohol experiences
Intoxication, consequences, coping, and emergencies.
Reflection prompt: Has alcohol ever taken more control, time, memory, or safety than you intended?
Nicotine & cannabis
Use patterns, responsibilities, spending, and adverse effects.
Reflection prompt: Does your current use fit your priorities, budget, responsibilities, and health?
Other substances
Nonmedical use, mixing, injection, and overdose history.
Reflection prompt: If any use felt hard to control or medically risky, what support would make the next step easier?
Rules, consequences & risk
Deception, property, discipline, gambling, and impaired driving.
Reflection prompt: Which past risk would you handle differently with what you know today?
Digital intimacy & boundaries
Intimate images, privacy, identity, and online meetings.
Reflection prompt: Do your digital habits preserve permission, deletion requests, and safety for everyone involved?
03 · Evidence
Evidence and safety anchors
The scoring system is our disclosed product method. Health and consent notes are anchored to public sources rather than to competitor averages or anonymous testimonials.
A documented archive record
Rice University's Woodson Research Center catalogs a “Purity Test” file from the 1990s. That record supports historical association, not ownership or endorsement of this site.
Rice archive record ↗One CDC testing baseline
CDC's March 17, 2026 STI testing page says everyone ages 13–64 should be tested for HIV at least once, while other testing depends on individual context.
CDC testing guidance ↗An emergency breathing sign
NIAAA lists fewer than 8 breaths per minute, or gaps of 10 seconds or more, among critical signs of alcohol overdose that require urgent action.
NIAAA alcohol overdose sheet ↗“Consent doesn’t end with a “yes” or “no.””
Primary and public sources · Reviewed against public sources on August 5, 2026.
04 · Answers
Rice Purity Test FAQ
Is a high Rice Purity Test score good?
No score is inherently good or bad. A high score only means fewer listed experiences were marked Yes. It can reflect preference, opportunity, age, memory, or willingness to disclose.
Is this the official Rice University test?
No. Test Rice Purity is an independent website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by Rice University. We do not use Rice University logos or claim official status.
Is the Rice Purity Test scientifically validated?
No. The familiar total is an equal-weight lifetime checklist, not a validated psychological scale. This version adds transparent methodology and evidence-based safety links without calling the score clinical science.
Are my answers stored or sent anywhere?
The quiz logic runs in your browser. Progress is stored only in localStorage on your device until you clear it. This MVP does not send individual answers or scores to a server or analytics service.
Why are there no average scores by age or country?
Published quiz sites rarely disclose a representative sample, recruitment method, location, date, exclusions, or weighting. Without those details, a precise average can mislead, so we do not present one as fact.
Can someone under 18 take it?
This version is designed for adults because it contains explicit sexual and substance-use questions. It is not an age-appropriate youth assessment.
Private by default
Rice Purity Test
A 100-question adult experience checklist with transparent scoring, ten useful category views, and answers that stay on your device.
Start the private test