Useful question
3–10 adults · private answer sets · one group reveal
Rice Purity Test for Friends
Each friend completes the same 100-question adult checklist privately, sends only a sealed total-score code, and lets the host reveal every added score together. Names, codes, and the group stay in the host's browser.
- 3–10 voluntary adults
- 0 individual answers in a score code
- No account or room server
00 · Direct answer
A local group reveal, not a popularity contest
This rice purity test for friends gives a group one shared workflow without collecting everyone's private history. The rice purity test for friends lets each adult answer 100 Yes or No items independently and create one score code only after finishing.
A responsible rice purity test for friends does not ask the host to collect screenshots or question-by-question answers. This rice purity test for friends puts one encrypted total and its opening key in the code, while the original 100 choices stay in the participant's browser.
The rice purity test for friends uses a local roster for three to ten people. In this rice purity test for friends, the host adds names and valid codes, sees a sealed status, and reveals all added totals in one interface action.
Use the rice purity test for friends as an optional group activity, never a measure of courage, honesty, maturity, health, or social status. The rice purity test for friends has no leaderboard, compatibility percentage, invented average, or automatic winner.
Anyone may decline the rice purity test for friends, stop before a result, keep a code private, or ask the host to remove it. A rice purity test for friends is worthwhile only when every adult can pass without pressure and no one demands the stories behind a number.
01 · Private group method
How the friends challenge works
The participant device calculates the score; the host device keeps the roster. No room, account, name, code, answer, or score is sent to this site because the workflow has no submission request.
- 01
Each friend answers privately
Open this page on a personal device, confirm the adult notice, and complete all 100 items. Progress remains in that browser until cleared.
- 02
Create one sealed score code
After the result appears, create and copy a code containing one encrypted total—not the 100 answers, category profile, name, or contact details.
- 03
The host builds a local roster
Add a short local label and each code. The page validates the code and rejects duplicate names, duplicate codes, malformed data, and groups above ten.
- 04
Reveal the added totals together
At three or more members, the host can reveal every valid total in one action. The view can be hidden again or erased from local storage.
02 · Host on this device
Build the local reveal group
Paste one score code per participant. Labels and codes are stored only in this browser. The interface stays sealed until at least three valid members are present.
Browser-local rosterMembers0/10
Minimum 3 · maximum 10
No members yet. Complete the test below or paste a code from a friend.
Your private Rice Purity Test checklist
Answer all 100 questions honestly
In this Rice Purity Test, choose Yes or No for every statement. Unanswered is never treated as No, and your score appears only after all 100 answers are complete. You can move between sections, and this browser saves progress locally until you clear it.
Designed for adults 18+
Before you begin
This Rice Purity Test checklist contains direct questions about sex, alcohol, drugs, legal consequences, and digital boundaries. It is for adults and is not a medical, moral, or psychological assessment.
Saved on this device
Your score100/100
Your private Rice Purity Test result
A count of experiences, not a verdict
0 experiences marked Yes
Reflection prompt
Friend's shared score—
Score difference—
Answer-combination analysis
Your private pattern report
This report looks at which answers appeared together. It describes concentrations and context; it does not infer personality, causation, or a diagnosis.
- Active subthemes
- 0
- Domains represented
- 0
- Safety contexts
- 0
The patterns carrying the most information
These are ranked by concentration, number of matched statements, and whether the cluster changes the safety context. A high rank is not a judgment.
Useful question
See the answers behind this pattern
Useful question
See the answers behind this pattern
Connections across domains
Cross-domain links appear only when the relevant answers co-occur. They show context, not proof that one experience caused another.
- Sexual-health answers overlap with impairment or substance context. Consent capacity, barrier decisions, testing, and disclosure should be reviewed together rather than as separate score points.
- Relationship-agreement answers overlap with digital permission or identity answers. The shared theme is whether expectations were explicit, current, and respected across both offline and online settings.
- Substance exposure appears together with control, responsibility, transport, financial, or acute-harm markers. That pattern carries more practical weight than substance variety alone.
- Several consensual or exploratory milestones are present without the listed elevated-risk markers. That narrows the context of this score, but it is not a guarantee of safety or wellbeing.
- Consequence markers appear in multiple domains. Consider whether a repeated situation, setting, or coping pattern links events that the total score treats as unrelated.
- No answer-triggered safety marker appeared. This means only that the specific listed markers were answered No; it does not establish zero risk.
Generated locally from 30 disclosed subthemes and six cross-domain rules. No answers leave this browser.
Your ten-category profile
The Rice Purity Test bars show how many items you marked in each category. They are not percentiles and do not compare you with an invented average.
Social & independence0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which choices felt genuinely independent, and which were driven by pressure or avoidance?
Dating & attraction0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Do your dating choices match the clarity and honesty you want from other people?
Relationships & commitments0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which relationship agreements deserve a clearer conversation now?
Consensual sexual experience0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Experience count says nothing about worth; consider whether your experiences were wanted, safe, and respectful.
Sexual health & decision context0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Is there any testing, contraception, boundary, or healthcare conversation worth arranging?
Alcohol experiences0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Has alcohol ever taken more control, time, memory, or safety than you intended?
Nicotine & cannabis0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Does your current use fit your priorities, budget, responsibilities, and health?
Other substances0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
If any use felt hard to control or medically risky, what support would make the next step easier?
Rules, consequences & risk0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Which past risk would you handle differently with what you know today?
Digital intimacy & boundaries0/10
Limited exposure in this category
Reflection prompt
Do your digital habits preserve permission, deletion requests, and safety for everyone involved?
Rice Purity Test answer-based safety notes
These notes appear only from patterns in your current answers. They are educational, not a diagnosis.
No additional safety note was triggered. That does not replace ordinary care, consent, or professional advice.
Revisit agreements, not labels
A marked secrecy or exclusivity item may signal an unresolved agreement. A direct, safe conversation can clarify expectations without treating the score as proof of intent.
Read about consent and communication ↗Testing decisions depend on context
A score cannot determine whether you need testing. CDC guidance says testing depends on sexual history, practices, symptoms, age, and local factors; a clinician can help choose appropriate tests.
CDC: getting tested for STIs ↗Consent is ongoing
Clear, voluntary agreement matters throughout an interaction, including when substances or digital media are involved. Uncertainty is a reason to pause and check in.
RAINN: Consent 101 ↗Blackouts and breathing problems are safety signals
Memory loss, loss of consciousness, vomiting, or trouble breathing are not ordinary score milestones. If an unconscious person cannot be awakened or breathes abnormally, seek emergency help.
NIAAA: alcohol overdose ↗Mixing can make effects more dangerous
CDC warns that combining alcohol with other drugs can increase overdose, injury, violence, and other harms. A healthcare professional or confidential support service can help assess personal risk.
CDC: alcohol and other drugs ↗Do not plan around impaired driving
A past ride or drive does not predict the future. Use a sober driver, transit, taxi, or a place to stay before drinking or using an impairing substance.
NHTSA: impaired driving ↗Permission travels with the image
Receiving an intimate image is not permission to keep, record, or redistribute it. Honor deletion requests and use platform reporting tools if an image was shared without consent.
FTC: image-based abuse ↗03 · Data boundary
Exactly what the group flow stores and reveals
Authenticated encryption can detect a changed code, but the code also carries the key needed to open its score. Anyone holding the complete code can technically decode that total; the sealed interface is a coordination aid, not secrecy from a determined code holder.
| Data | Where it exists | What the group sees |
|---|---|---|
| 100 individual Yes or No answers | Participant's browser storage | Never included in the score code or host roster |
| One total score | Encrypted inside the shared code | Shown when the host chooses Reveal |
| Opening key | Inside the same shared code | Not displayed, but available to any code holder |
| Local member label and code | Host browser storage | Visible only on that host device |
| Account, email, phone, or room ID | Not requested | Nothing to reveal or upload |
04 · Group boundaries
Four rules for a fair friend-group activity
A group invitation is not consent to discuss anyone's history. Agree on how codes will be handled, let people pass, and decide when the host will erase the local roster.
Voluntary from start to finish
Invite once and accept no without debate. A participant can stop, keep the result, or withdraw a code before reveal without explaining why.
No screenshots or answer audits
The total is the only intended disclosure. Do not request category screens, browser history, proof of answers, or stories attached to a particular score.
No rankings or moral labels
A higher number means fewer listed experiences; a lower number means more. Neither proves honesty, wisdom, health, confidence, or value within the group.
Choose an erase moment
After the activity, use Clear local group and ask participants to clear their own saved test if they wish. Hiding scores does not delete the roster.
05 · Ten private areas
Ten private areas sit behind every total
The equal-weight score compresses very different contexts into one number. These ten category views remain on each participant's device and help private reflection; they are deliberately absent from the shared group code.
Social & independence
Travel, parties, spontaneity, and private decisions.
Dating & attraction
First dates, kissing, apps, and early communication.
Relationships & commitments
Attachment, partnership, exclusivity, and secrecy.
Consensual sexual experience
A neutral count of adult sexual experiences.
Sexual health & decision context
Protection, testing, impairment, and informed consent.
Alcohol experiences
Intoxication, consequences, coping, and emergencies.
Nicotine & cannabis
Use patterns, responsibilities, spending, and adverse effects.
Other substances
Nonmedical use, mixing, injection, and overdose history.
Rules, consequences & risk
Deception, property, discipline, gambling, and impaired driving.
Digital intimacy & boundaries
Intimate images, privacy, identity, and online meetings.
06 · Optional conversation
Optional prompts after the group reveal
Use a prompt only if the group wants a conversation. Anyone can pass, and nobody should be asked to identify the answers behind a total.
- 01
What assumption about the highest or lowest score should we avoid?
- 02
Does everyone want to discuss the numbers, or simply end the activity?
- 03
Which present-day safety choice matters more than any score?
- 04
What group boundary would make future activities feel more comfortable?
- 05
Should the host hide the view now or clear the group completely?
- 06
Is there any participant who wants their local label removed before we continue?
07 · Verified context
Checkable security, history, and consent context
Product claims here are reproducible in the browser. Outside sources explain authenticated encryption, historical association, and consent; none validates the score as psychology or a population benchmark.
A reproducible local workflow
Reviewed August 12, 2026: a reveal needs 3–10 valid codes; each score follows 100 answers; the workflow makes 0 answer submissions to a room or account.
Review the scoring methodAuthenticated score-code format
The page uses an AES-GCM 256-bit key and a fresh 96-bit IV. NIST documents GCM as authenticated encryption; the shared code also contains its key, so possession permits opening the total.
NIST SP 800-38D ↗A documented Rice archive record
Rice University's Woodson Research Center catalogs a Purity Test file from the 1990s. That supports historical association, not endorsement of this independent site or group tool.
Rice archive catalog ↗“You always have the right to set and adjust your boundaries based on what you’re comfortable with in the moment.”
The National Domestic Violence Hotline states this boundary plainly. It applies to group participation and any later conversation; it is not a score interpretation.
The National Domestic Violence Hotline — Consent ↗Primary and official sources
08 · FAQ
Rice Purity Test for friends FAQ
01Can the host see individual answers?
+
No. The code contains one encrypted total and its key. The host roster never receives question choices or category counts, and this site provides no answer-upload endpoint.
02Why does the group need at least three people?
+
This page is designed for a group rather than a disguised one-to-one comparison. Three is a product rule, not a scientific threshold, and the local roster supports at most ten people to remain readable.
03Can a technical host open a score before pressing Reveal?
+
Yes. The complete code must carry the key so this serverless page can open it. The interface coordinates a simultaneous reveal, but it cannot prevent a code holder from decoding the total with technical tools.
04Does encryption make the score code anonymous?
+
No. The code does not include a name or answers, but a sender, message thread, or chosen local label can identify its owner. Share it only with a host you trust.
05What happens if a code is edited?
+
AES-GCM authentication causes changed or incomplete codes to fail validation. The group rejects them instead of guessing a score. The participant can create and send a fresh code.
06How do I delete the group?
+
Choose Clear local group to remove member labels and codes from this browser's local storage. Each participant controls and can separately clear their own answer progress on their device.
Private answers · minimal score sharing
Start only when passing is genuinely easy
Let every friend answer independently, share only a score code by choice, reveal without rankings, and erase the local roster when the activity ends. A respectful stop is a successful outcome too.